SCI Logo

Scalextric USA
Pioneer Slot Cars
SCIs  MarketPlace, the online slot car mall
Carrera Slot Cars
Fly Model Car
BRM Model Cars
NINCO
MRC
AFX
Slot.it
Slot Car Illustrated Forum  

Go Back   Slot Car Illustrated Forum > Scale Racing > Digital

View Poll Results: Do you use a crossover or over/under in your layout?
Yes 161 68.22%
No 75 31.78%
Voters: 236. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-11-2010, 08:03 PM
Porsche Racer's Avatar
Porsche Racer Porsche Racer is offline
Championship Contender
View Porsche Racer's Photo Album
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 1,555
Default Poll: Do you use an overpass on your track?

I was just finishing up my new digital track layout and debated whether or not to put an overpass (over/under) in the layout.

So, do you use one in your layout?

Last edited by Porsche Racer; 07-12-2010 at 05:18 PM. Reason: terminology
  #2  
Old 07-12-2010, 04:21 AM
regalman82 regalman82 is offline
Novice Racer
View regalman82's Photo Album
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Gulf coast, Miss. USA
Posts: 46
Default

I put a single x-over in the layout, so in two laps you have to run both lanes. Makes you have to switch lanes for the best line around the track.

Regalman
  #3  
Old 07-12-2010, 07:51 AM
mfogg's Avatar
mfogg mfogg is offline
International Racer
View mfogg's Photo Album
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Naples, Florida, USA, Earth
Posts: 630
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Porsche Racer View Post
...crossover (over/under)...
Your terminology is a bit confusing.

If by "crossover" you mean a track piece that switches (X) the two lanes, IMO that would negate one of the basic features of digital slot racing which is to allow the driver to control which lane they are in. It would also increase the risk of damage to the cars. But, hey, you are free to choose.

If you mean a two-way 90° intersection, I would never use this type of track piece because it exposes the cars to a much higher probability of severe damage due to head-to-side collisions.

If by "over/under" you mean a fly over or overpass, why not? Elevation changes make slot racing much more interesting.

Michael

Last edited by mfogg; 07-12-2010 at 08:20 AM. Reason: Clarity
  #4  
Old 07-12-2010, 09:54 AM
LDFan LDFan is offline
International Racer
View LDFan's Photo Album
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 797
Default

If you mean over and under, I probably have overdone it as evidenced in my last track.....









It was a pain to build but a joy to race.

But at least the lighting was nice.



Dave
  #5  
Old 07-12-2010, 10:04 AM
MrFlippant's Avatar
MrFlippant MrFlippant is offline
Digital Advocate
View MrFlippant's Photo Album
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Auburn, WA, USA
Posts: 4,314
Default

Got any meatballs and sauce for all that spaghetti?
But seriously, that track is amazing.

I used to have a crossover (where two lanes swap places) in my digital track. It's not anti-digital. In fact, they force a driver to change lanes again to maintain their preferred race line, or if they're an analog driver that never chances lanes, it's easier to pass them knowing that they'll be in the other lane on the next lap.

As for overpasses/over-under/bridges, etc... I don't have any in my current layout but I don't really have anything against them. I just haven't figured out a layout I like that uses them for my table. When I was rug racing, and essentially had no boundaries, we had overpasses almost every time.
  #6  
Old 07-12-2010, 10:38 AM
DrumPhil's Avatar
DrumPhil DrumPhil is offline
Championship Contender
View DrumPhil's Photo Album
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seward, NE
Posts: 1,945
Default

The only thing I didn't like about the overpass on my early track layouts was the portion of (under) track where you can't see the car. Some people like it, and put in tunnels, etc. but it's a bad place to put a lane changer. It does even up lane lengths, which is helpful even for digital. Not all cars prefer the same line, and it's nice to not penalize one lane with longer distance.

My current layout (see my gallery) uses the Carrera crossover pieces to come downhill from the elevated section. Elevation change is a GREAT addition to a layout!
  #7  
Old 07-12-2010, 05:15 PM
Porsche Racer's Avatar
Porsche Racer Porsche Racer is offline
Championship Contender
View Porsche Racer's Photo Album
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 1,555
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mfogg View Post
Your terminology is a bit confusing.


If by "over/under" you mean a fly over or overpass, why not? Elevation changes make slot racing much more interesting.

Michael
I mean this ^^^

Sorry to have confused you.
  #8  
Old 07-13-2010, 07:17 AM
noddaz's Avatar
noddaz noddaz is offline
Championship Contender
View noddaz's Photo Album
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Slotcar, Maryland
Posts: 1,500
Default whoa!

Quote:
Originally Posted by LDFan View Post
If you mean over and under, I probably have overdone it as evidenced in my last track.....





*snip*



Dave
But how can you tell how much is one lap?

Scott
  #9  
Old 07-13-2010, 09:21 AM
rixvette's Avatar
rixvette rixvette is offline
Top Qualifier
View rixvette's Photo Album
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Abingdon, Maryland
Posts: 3,680
Default

I enjoy 'technical' tracks but too many turns can be tedious. Three basic ingredients to an enjoyable track are a nice straight, some changing radius curves to throw off the timing and an over/under to equal the lanes. Typically, guys who have lots of track will make a four lane track with good drivability.
  #10  
Old 07-13-2010, 09:47 AM
Sotvotkong's Avatar
Sotvotkong Sotvotkong is offline
National Racer
View Sotvotkong's Photo Album
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: utah slc
Posts: 414
Default

i had alot of overpasses/elevation in my last track and marshaling it was a pain. so this time around its a flat track, much easier to marshal. but in personal racing prefferance. i perfer to have overpasses and elevation, as its funner to race on.
  #11  
Old 07-13-2010, 10:02 AM
scrjon's Avatar
scrjon scrjon is offline
Championship Contender
View scrjon's Photo Album
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Union Mo
Posts: 2,701
Default

I like elevation changes but not over passes I like a uncovered track just mho

  #12  
Old 07-13-2010, 10:21 AM
kidvoltage's Avatar
kidvoltage kidvoltage is offline
SCI Administrator
View kidvoltage's Photo Album
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Hillsboro, OR
Posts: 2,557
Default

Yes we do.



  #13  
Old 07-13-2010, 11:44 PM
LDFan LDFan is offline
International Racer
View LDFan's Photo Album
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 797
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by noddaz View Post
But how can you tell how much is one lap?

Scott

Not sure if you're referring to the loop back which was designed to screw people up on their lap times.


Regardless, the fastest I was able to achieve on this track w/o getting caught in the loop was 19.1 seconds for 120 feet of track (approximately about 110 - 115 scale mph I think). It was a great track to race on even though some of my racers would beg to differ.

Anyway, I already tore the track down and in the process of designing a more simpler layout w/ at least one overpass. I learned my lesson that being overly complicated on a design is not the best way to approach things.

And if anyone is interested, here's the video I made if you want to see how this layout worked. It's actually very cool; two directional traffic, double decker, etc.



Dave

Last edited by LDFan; 07-13-2010 at 11:51 PM.
  #14  
Old 07-18-2010, 09:24 AM
Robert Robert is offline
International Racer
View Robert's Photo Album
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Terrace B.C. Canada
Posts: 871
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Porsche Racer View Post
I mean this ^^^

Sorry to have confused you.
Hi, yes i have a overpass and voted yes,but i think your pole might be a bit misconstrued in total numbers in the fact so many did not no what an overpass was and voted anyway. To bad it didn't seem all that complicated. Maybe it's a Canuck thing. oop's don't want to start another pole Robert
  #15  
Old 07-18-2010, 02:18 PM
Porsche Racer's Avatar
Porsche Racer Porsche Racer is offline
Championship Contender
View Porsche Racer's Photo Album
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 1,555
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Robert View Post
Hi, yes i have a overpass and voted yes,but i think your pole might be a bit misconstrued in total numbers in the fact so many did not no what an overpass was and voted anyway. To bad it didn't seem all that complicated. Maybe it's a Canuck thing. oop's don't want to start another pole Robert


Ever since I was kid with my Eldon track, my friends and I always called an overpass an over/under or a crossover (The track crosses over itself). And a "crossover" (X track) as it seems to be called on here was always a switch track or lane change track to me and my friends.

Oh well.
Closed Thread

Bookmarks
  •   
  •   
  •   
  •   
  •   
  •   
  •   
  •   
  •   
  •   
  •   
  •   
  •   
  •   
  •   
  •   
  •   
  •   
  •   
  •   
  •   
  •   
  •   
  •   
  •   
  •   
  •   
  •   
  •   
  •   
  •   
  •   
  •   
  •   
  •   
  •   
  •   

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:08 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.